***
When Rape Isn’t in Black and White
By Mark Anthony Neal
As the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case unfolded in the spring of this year, it became a national obsession. Part of our fascination with the case was that it played to racial scripts that we have become all too complicit in maintaining—there remains no better drama in American life, than sex and violence across the color line. But once we step back across that color line and back to the comforts of our own segregated communities and institutions, we are suddenly met with silence and denial when confronted with the issue of sexual violence against black women and girls, particularly when its at the hands of black men and boys. Recent allegations of rape against students at Morehouse College, the historically black male college in Atlanta, by members of its sister school, Spelman College and the response by some “Morehouse Men” to those allegations, speaks volumes about just how far black communities need to go to take serious the threat that sexual violence poses to our communities.
That a rape might have occurred on the Morehouse or Spelman campuses is disturbing, but not unusual. As is the case at many other colleges and universities across the country, sexual assault can occur “early and often” during the new school year, as women students acclimate themselves to the physical landscape of their campuses and negotiate social scenes often predicated on alcohol consumption and the prevalence of a “hook-up” culture. Many of the Women’s Centers and the like on campuses are well aware of these trends—including the number of unreported date rapes that occur in this context—so it was perfectly normal that Spelman’s chapter of the Feminist Majority Leadership Alliance (FMLA) chose to speak out forcefully about the alleged rapes that occurred this month and the issues of sexual assault and violence in general.
In a statement Spelman College’s FMLA asserted that “Within the past two weeks two Spelman students have reported incidents of rape allegedly involving Morehouse students. As Spelman students we were outraged by this news and deeply saddened by the complacency surrounding the issue within the Atlanta University Center (AUC). We hear about such incidents several times a semester, through word of mouth and rumor. The facts are often misconstrued.”. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports on Wednesday September 20, 2006, that over 150 women participated in a march from Spelman’s campus to Morehouse, where they held a speak-out. The FMLA reports that the open forum contained “passionate and explosive opinions” on both sides.
Both sides? Well of course there were not any folks advocating for rape, but within black institutions that still value patriarchy and the “stability” it supposedly engenders , black women (and a few men) are often admonished for publicly criticizing and holding black men accountable for behavior that is clearly detrimental to our communities and our shared humanities. Members of the Morehouse College student senate, for example, introduced a bill condemning the Spelman College protest, arguing that said protest “created a hostile environment” and “encouraged bad press and character defamation to Morehouse College and its student body.” The senate also castigated the FMLA for apparently not asking their permission (“Morehouse College Student Government Association was not invited to assist in the planning of the protest”). In the final section of the bill, the Morehouse College student senate requested “a public apology from the Advisor(s) to FMLA (Feminist Majority Leaders Alliance), and student leadership of FMLA and all other organizers of the demonstration for its unruly nature”. The language of the bill was clear, the sanctity of the “body” of Morehouse College was more important than the bodies of black women—their sisters, friends, lovers, etc.—who are defiled in acts of rape and other forms of sexual violence.
To their credit, the Morehouse Men were savvy enough to issue a joint statement stating that they “stand firm against any act of sex that is not consensual—violent or nonviolent—that is forced upon any individual” and “stand firm behind victims--vocal or quiet--of this heinous transgression.” But such statements carry no weight if young men are unwilling to let women—the most likely victims of rape—the ability to express their own rage and concern on their own terms. As Spelman Professor William Jelani Cobb reports, the protesters were “taunted and jeered and only a handful of men were brave enough to join the protest”. Cobb adds, “Morehouse needs to respond to the intolerant reaction a number of their students had regarding the protest. That kind of behavior is absolutely unacceptable.”
Black men often think that they lack privilege, but that is in relation to the relative privilege of their white male peers. Their privilege, in relationship to black women is real and it is often the basis, particularly within elite black institutions, that black women are expected to serve the needs—politically, socially, emotionally and sexually—of black men. In many ways the reaction of some Morehouse men, to the Spelman FMLA protest, has to do with the willingness of those women to challenge the social contract between them. Until black men are willing to break ranks with their masculine privilege, any claims of support—heartfelt or not—will ring hollow.
***
Mark Anthony Neal is Associate Professor of African and African-American Studies at Duke University where he also serves as the Director of the Institute for Critical U.S. Studies.
By Mark Anthony Neal
As the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case unfolded in the spring of this year, it became a national obsession. Part of our fascination with the case was that it played to racial scripts that we have become all too complicit in maintaining—there remains no better drama in American life, than sex and violence across the color line. But once we step back across that color line and back to the comforts of our own segregated communities and institutions, we are suddenly met with silence and denial when confronted with the issue of sexual violence against black women and girls, particularly when its at the hands of black men and boys. Recent allegations of rape against students at Morehouse College, the historically black male college in Atlanta, by members of its sister school, Spelman College and the response by some “Morehouse Men” to those allegations, speaks volumes about just how far black communities need to go to take serious the threat that sexual violence poses to our communities.
That a rape might have occurred on the Morehouse or Spelman campuses is disturbing, but not unusual. As is the case at many other colleges and universities across the country, sexual assault can occur “early and often” during the new school year, as women students acclimate themselves to the physical landscape of their campuses and negotiate social scenes often predicated on alcohol consumption and the prevalence of a “hook-up” culture. Many of the Women’s Centers and the like on campuses are well aware of these trends—including the number of unreported date rapes that occur in this context—so it was perfectly normal that Spelman’s chapter of the Feminist Majority Leadership Alliance (FMLA) chose to speak out forcefully about the alleged rapes that occurred this month and the issues of sexual assault and violence in general.
In a statement Spelman College’s FMLA asserted that “Within the past two weeks two Spelman students have reported incidents of rape allegedly involving Morehouse students. As Spelman students we were outraged by this news and deeply saddened by the complacency surrounding the issue within the Atlanta University Center (AUC). We hear about such incidents several times a semester, through word of mouth and rumor. The facts are often misconstrued.”. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports on Wednesday September 20, 2006, that over 150 women participated in a march from Spelman’s campus to Morehouse, where they held a speak-out. The FMLA reports that the open forum contained “passionate and explosive opinions” on both sides.
Both sides? Well of course there were not any folks advocating for rape, but within black institutions that still value patriarchy and the “stability” it supposedly engenders , black women (and a few men) are often admonished for publicly criticizing and holding black men accountable for behavior that is clearly detrimental to our communities and our shared humanities. Members of the Morehouse College student senate, for example, introduced a bill condemning the Spelman College protest, arguing that said protest “created a hostile environment” and “encouraged bad press and character defamation to Morehouse College and its student body.” The senate also castigated the FMLA for apparently not asking their permission (“Morehouse College Student Government Association was not invited to assist in the planning of the protest”). In the final section of the bill, the Morehouse College student senate requested “a public apology from the Advisor(s) to FMLA (Feminist Majority Leaders Alliance), and student leadership of FMLA and all other organizers of the demonstration for its unruly nature”. The language of the bill was clear, the sanctity of the “body” of Morehouse College was more important than the bodies of black women—their sisters, friends, lovers, etc.—who are defiled in acts of rape and other forms of sexual violence.
To their credit, the Morehouse Men were savvy enough to issue a joint statement stating that they “stand firm against any act of sex that is not consensual—violent or nonviolent—that is forced upon any individual” and “stand firm behind victims--vocal or quiet--of this heinous transgression.” But such statements carry no weight if young men are unwilling to let women—the most likely victims of rape—the ability to express their own rage and concern on their own terms. As Spelman Professor William Jelani Cobb reports, the protesters were “taunted and jeered and only a handful of men were brave enough to join the protest”. Cobb adds, “Morehouse needs to respond to the intolerant reaction a number of their students had regarding the protest. That kind of behavior is absolutely unacceptable.”
Black men often think that they lack privilege, but that is in relation to the relative privilege of their white male peers. Their privilege, in relationship to black women is real and it is often the basis, particularly within elite black institutions, that black women are expected to serve the needs—politically, socially, emotionally and sexually—of black men. In many ways the reaction of some Morehouse men, to the Spelman FMLA protest, has to do with the willingness of those women to challenge the social contract between them. Until black men are willing to break ranks with their masculine privilege, any claims of support—heartfelt or not—will ring hollow.
***
Mark Anthony Neal is Associate Professor of African and African-American Studies at Duke University where he also serves as the Director of the Institute for Critical U.S. Studies.


3 comments:
I actually saw the event that took place on the campus of Morehouse College. I agree with your notions of protecting our black women, but I'm very disturbed by this statement...As Spelman Professor William Jelani Cobb
reports, the protesters were "taunted and jeered and only a handful of men
were brave enough to join the protest"...This radical feminist protest was planned very poorly. Public accusations of individuals or organizations should not be tolerated if no proof is evident. There were young women threatening, and even to the extent of assaulting young men, who were unaware of any rape issue. The apology is necessary and should not be a plea. I believe rape in the black community is taboo, especially at HBCUs. First of all, if there was evidence of rape, why weren't the proper authorities notified of this situation? You hear rumors of rape all the time, but no one ever comes forward with facts. This whole situation could have been easily resolved if there was proper communication between both Spelman and Morehouse bodies. Secondly, if Spelman was increasing the awareness of rape in the "AUC", why didnt they protest on Clark-Atlanta University's campus? I believe that the moral standards of our young, gifted and talented tenth seems to be losing its gurth. Must be something in the water.
1) I graduated from Spelman in 1998. Sadly, the sexism is the same as it was 8 years ago. This disturbs, but does NOT surprise me.
2) About the proper authorities.
Spelman and most if not all universities and colleges demand that rape victims contact campus police FIRST. This is about damage control. Spelman (& Morehouse, CAU, MB) instructed us repeatedly about calling campus police, who are held out to be THE police for campus purposes. the number (that must be committed to memory by EVERY Spelmanite) is 525-6401. I will never forget it. I can't remember my best friends' numbers - but I still remember that one. If a victim calls 911, the call will be transferred to 525-6401.
3) They didn't protest on Clark b/c the issue took place between Spelman & Morehouse. Clark-AUC is JUST a name. Clark is not the main campus or head of anything.
Hello Mr. Neal;
I've got a few issues with your stance on the Morehouse Spelman Rape Case. Read them... or not. I simply had to express it. Please take note of the following...
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/atlanta/stories/2006/10/01/1001metspelman.html
Spelman, Morehouse tense over rape rumors
By ANDREA JONES
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 10/01/06
***excerpt***
According to the report, a Spelman student told Atlanta police she had been sexually assaulted by a Morehouse student after a party on Sept. 16. In the report, the student said she went with the man back to his residence where he began making sexual advances. At one point, the student said she told the man, "I'm not doing this." But, after continued advances, she performed oral sex on him. She said "she did not want to, but she did not tell the suspect no," according to the police report. She later had sex with the man, the report states, and did not say no. She told police she was in an "uncomfortable situation and did not know what to do." The report says she went to Grady Memorial Hospital and, after first deciding not to press charges, went to Atlanta police about the incident.
According to what she told the police... she willingly went back to this young mans abode and he begins to make supposedly unwanted sexual advances toward her. (this is the first instance in which she should have left immediately had this been uncomfortable, is she not to be held accountable for her action in staying here?). She told the guy, "I'm not doing this." but he continues to advance. (this is the second instance in which she should have left immediately had this been uncomfortable. Again I ask, is she not to be held accountable for her action in staying here?). So she stays and proceeds to have oral sex with him... AFTER saying "I'm not doing this.". Mind you, she could have left after this. THEN she has sex with him AFTER having oral sex AFTER saying, "I'm not doing this."... c'mon... THEN she admits that she didn't say no to the sexual act... I mean really... Three opportunities to extract herself from this situation? Where is the rape? Is every sexual act with a woman rape?
OK... now this...
Same article as before...
Spelman senior Leana Cabral, who serves as co-president of the Feminist Majority Leadership Alliance, said she and other students decided to hold a rally to get the issue of sexual assault out into the open. In addition to the protest, the students have asked for specific actions by Spelman to address sexual assault on campus, including the establishment of a crisis hotline and sexual assault center.
On Sept. 20, they donned handmade T-shirts with slogans such as, "She's my Sister," and "No means No," and marched through campus. About 150 students crossed over to nearby Clark Atlanta University and onto Morehouse's campus, where the results of student government elections were being announced. Shouting, "Stop the Rape," they faced off with Morehouse students, many of whom were visibly angry, Cabral said.
"They were getting the point so wrong — we weren't going there against them. We were going there to work with them and try to raise awareness," she said.
Let me get this straight... They make t-shirts with slogans such as, "She's my Sister," and "No means No", when there has been no proven rape might I add, and gather 150 strong and march onto the Morehouse campus shouting STOP THE RAPE? Then have the unmitigated gall to say that "They were getting the point so wrong — we weren't going there against them. We were going there to work with them and try to raise awareness," You must be kidding me. I think otherwise. I think that the students of the Morehouse campus got very clearly what the Spelman students were trying to say. The Spelman Students went to the campus to accuse them collectively of rape and that's exactly what they did. The Morehouse students saw it for what it was and rightfully became offended.
Now then... in light of the above i'd like to address your article in particular...
The Morehouse Students were absolutely correct in their stance and the 'protest', as disorganized as it was, should be condemned. This feminists organization created an 'Us Vs Them' environment by acting they way that they acted especially since there is no proof of rape. Need I restate that there are merely allegations? Nothing is known for certain. To publically accuse (by marching onto the campus shouting "STOP THE RAPE") an individual or a group of wrong doing with no proof whatsoever should not and cannot be tolerated.
Since there is no evidence of wrong doing nor is there any proof that a rape actually occured this statement by you, "black women (and a few men) are often admonished for publicly criticizing and holding black men accountable for behavior that is clearly detrimental to our communities and our shared humanities." doesn't seem to make sense. What behavior are you referring to? Do you mean that 'alleged behavior'?
If Spelman honestly wanted to work with Morehouse, the feminist group would have or should have come to them in a manner that was not accusatory. As it stands they did not and their rash, unplanned and disorganized acts were met with the the deserved response. Not all black men are rapists. Not all black men are predators.
This statement, in my opinion, ultimately displays your own personal bias about the individuals at Morehouse, "To their credit, the Morehouse Men were savvy enough to issue a joint statement stating that they “stand firm against any act of sex that is not consensual—violent or nonviolent—that is forced upon any individual” and “stand firm behind victims--vocal or quiet--of this heinous transgression.”" Savvy? Hmmmmm... interesting choice of words all around. Is it impossible that these words are true? Is it not possible that the students at Morehouse are equally appalled by rape? Is it not possible that the majority of the students that you seem so willing to vilify were completely unaware of this situation? Is it not possible that the wrong way to handle this situation was to march onto their campus and shout 'STOP THE RAPE'?
Which leads us to what I consider to be the coup de grace. "But such statements carry no weight if young men are unwilling to let women—the most likely victims of rape—the ability to express their own rage and concern on their own terms. As Spelman Professor William Jelani Cobb reports, the protesters were “taunted and jeered and only a handful of men were brave enough to join the protest”. Cobb adds, “Morehouse needs to respond to the intolerant reaction a number of their students had regarding the protest. That kind of behavior is absolutely unacceptable.”"
Express rage and concern in their own terms? I sincerely hope that this individual was saying this in jest. I'm sure you'd be unhappy if a man expressed his rage and or concern in an abusive manner towards a woman and this protest is in my opinion an act of abuse, particularly it is emotional abuse. You're 40 yrs old now, however consider what your reaction would have been were you 19 or 20. A group of angry young ladies storm your campus in the midst of righteous 'rage and concern' regarding a crime that no one knows was actually committed and begin implying that the individuals that are in the area are co-conspirators, by virtue of their gender, in one of the most disgusting acts known to man. I think you'd probably be intolerant of their browbeating as well. But then again, you might have been a saint. Who knows.
My point is the situation was handled extremely badly and the women were the ones who handled it badly. Will someone demand that she be arrested for filing a false report if that happens to be the case? Will there be any apologies if it is deemed that the young lady wasn't actually raped? Nah... I doubt it. So much for privilege eh?
Uncontainable Spirit
Post a Comment